I have been wondering recently, about why cable TV costs so much. And why, specifically, my cable TV provider recently jacked up the price of my cable TV, simply because I stopped buying Internet access from them. The two are not related. Nor should their prices be. I understand the concept of a grocery store offering a lower price if you buy larger quantities (food will sell faster, less likely to spoil, less inventory sitting on the shelf, more money for all, win-win situation). But if Sam’s club decides to offer a discount on a washing machine if you buy a set of new tires, people are going to go, “wtf?”. The two products aren’t related at all. In fact the only relationship they have is that they’re sold at the same store.
One could argue that Television and Internet are related, but one does not affect the other. The infrastructures needed to put TV and Internet down the same tube are completely independent. The frequencies of the data running down the wire are different. One does not affect the other. It’s just masquerading as the “buy more, pay less” deal, which has no bearing here.
I recently switched Internet providers from Comcast Cable to AT&T DSL. DSL offered slightly slower download speed, and better upload speed, for less than what I was paying. But Comcast raised the price of the Cable TV I have had. They raised it by substantially more than what I was saving by switching to AT&T.
I’ve been contemplating what to do about this. I do not want to spend more than I what I was originally. And I do not want to switch back to Comcast, as badly as they have been behaving. They don’t deserve my business.
I considered Satellite TV, but found out my apartment complex charges a hefty installation deposit, on top of whatever setup fees are necessary from the provider itself, like DirecTV or Dish. And it wouldn’t really save me that much money. I would end up paying two different companies about the same as I was giving Comcast before I switched to DSL.
Another option was to ditch TV entirely. I could have an antenna for the local news, and major network programming. I could have sites like hulu.com for shows like The Daily Show, and other cable network television I would want to keep up with. This option seemed extreme. But it would save a substantial amount of money.
Tempting, but, I wasn’t sure I wanted to go quite that extreme.
Recently, I’ve been reading about the Roku Netflix box. It seems to sweeten the deal. In my mind, combining this instant download service with my XBox 360, and broadcast TV just about makes up for the loss.
These instant movies and TV shows through Netflix are unlimited, even with the least plan, a measly $9/month. So I’ll be saving over $45 per month, over $500 a year, and if I get bored surfing the web or with broadcast TV, I can always watch a random movie off of Netflix instantly.
The device from Roku is actually $99, and I would need to purchase two antennas for my televisions, both $15. So in order for the savings to actually pay off, I need to switch for at least 3 months.
I’ve made my decision: for the next three months, I’m going to try the Roku box/antenna combo. If I don’t like it, I can cancel Netflix, sign up for cable again, and sell the roku box on ebay. Although something tells me I’m going to like it. There are rumors flying about Roku introducing new content providers with a firmware upgrade. I hope they’re true, and I hope the content is as good as Netflix’s 10000 on-demand movies.